Publishers run many different CMSs, from WordPress at large news brands to Sanity, Ghost and Statamic at digital-native and newsroom projects. This page lists twelve examples. Each is included only where a vendor case study or showcase page names the publisher, and each row links to that page.
Choosing a CMS is easier when you know what comparable publishers run. The hard part is finding reliable evidence. Tools that guess a site’s technology from its page source are often wrong, and vendor logo walls rarely say what the logo is used for. This page takes a stricter route. Every example below comes from a page by the vendor or the publisher that names the CMS, and each row links to it.
Which publishers run which CMS?
| Publisher | CMS | What the source says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIME | WordPress (WordPress VIP) | Transitioned in 2015 from a legacy publishing solution to WordPress and the WordPress VIP platform | WordPress VIP case study |
| CNN Brasil | WordPress (WordPress VIP) | Migrated to WordPress VIP, open source solutions and off-the-shelf plug-ins | WordPress VIP case study |
| ADWEEK | WordPress (WordPress VIP) | Migrated to WordPress VIP in May 2024 | WordPress VIP case study |
| Recurrent Ventures | WordPress (WordPress VIP) | Standardized on WordPress VIP in 2022 | WordPress VIP case study |
| Pew Research Center | WordPress (WordPress VIP) | WordPress VIP remained the publishing system and delivery layer for its research pages | WordPress VIP case study |
| Morning Brew | Sanity | Runs 13 brands on a single Content Operating System built on Sanity | Sanity customer story |
| DER SPIEGEL | Statamic | Listed as built by SPIEGEL_techlab | Statamic showcase |
| TV2 | Statamic | Listed as built by TV2 | Statamic showcase |
| 404 Media | Ghost | Listed among Ghost publications | Ghost Explore |
| Platformer | Ghost | Listed among Ghost publications | Ghost Explore |
| The Lever | Ghost | Listed among Ghost publications | Ghost Explore |
| Hyperallergic | Ghost | Listed among Ghost publications | Ghost Explore |
All pages were opened on 2026-10-10. A listing can go out of date, so confirm on the publisher’s current site if it matters to your decision.
What does the list show?
Three patterns stand out, though the sample is small and chosen by vendors, so it says nothing about market share.
Large news brands and managed WordPress
Five of the examples come from one vendor’s case studies. WordPress VIP, the managed hosting and support service named in them, is built around WordPress, and the publishers listed range from a news magazine to a research organisation. Several of them describe migrations, not greenfield builds. For a large team, the pattern is a mainstream open-source CMS with a vendor handling hosting and scale. Our WordPress profile covers the product itself.
Digital-native media and a structured content platform
Morning Brew’s story describes a content platform built on Sanity that serves 13 brands and several internal tools. That is an example of the headless approach explained in What is a CMS?: content stored as structured data, with custom applications for editors, ad operations and partners. It also shows the cost. Building those tools takes engineers, and the story says six of them run the operation. See the Sanity profile.
Developer-friendly systems at newsrooms
Statamic’s showcase lists DER SPIEGEL and TV2 among sites built with it, with the builder credited as the publisher’s own technology team in each case. It is a reminder that some newsrooms prefer to build on a flexible system with in-house developers. See the Statamic profile.
Independent publications on Ghost
Ghost’s Explore page lists independent publications that run on it. The ones we picked are news and culture titles. See the Ghost profile.
How should you use examples like these?
Treat them as a way to build a shortlist and a list of questions.
- Look at the publisher’s size and team. A system that works for a 100-person newsroom with an engineering department may not suit two editors.
- Check the type. Managed WordPress, a headless platform and a hosted newsletter tool are different products with different costs.
- Ask for the full picture. A case study is written to promote the product. It rarely mentions what went wrong or what the publisher pays.
- Run your own trial. Follow our trial guide with your content and editors.
- Read critically. How to read CMS reviews covers the questions to ask of vendor-written pages.
What did we leave out?
We left out publishers where the only evidence is a technology-detection tool, a logo wall without a statement of use, or a case study that does not say what the publisher runs. For example, vendor case studies for two other publishers sat on pages that discuss analytics, not the publishing platform, so we did not list them. The directory of CMS profiles has more on each product, and our comparison pages put them side by side.
Questions people ask
Why only twelve examples?
We included a publisher only where a vendor case study, a vendor showcase page or the publisher itself names the CMS. Third-party detection tools can be wrong or out of date, so we did not use them.
Does a vendor case study prove the CMS is a good choice?
No. It shows that a publisher uses the product, usually written by the vendor to promote it. Treat it as evidence of use, not of fit, and test the system against your own needs.
Do publishers use one CMS for everything?
Not always. Large publishers often run several systems, for example one for the main site and another for newsletters or special projects. A listed example shows what a named site uses, not the publisher's entire stack.
Can the CMS behind a site change?
Yes. Publishers migrate, as the TIME and ADWEEK case studies describe. Dates on each row show when we checked, and a vendor page may not reflect later moves.
Sources
- WordPress VIP's TIME.com case study says TIME.com transitioned in 2015 from a dated, inflexible legacy publishing solution to the WordPress CMS and the WordPress VIP platform. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- WordPress VIP's CNN Brasil case study says that migrating to WordPress VIP, open source solutions and off-the-shelf WordPress plug-ins dramatically closed the gap. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- WordPress VIP's ADWEEK case study says ADWEEK migrated to WordPress VIP in May 2024. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- WordPress VIP's Recurrent Ventures case study says that in 2022 Recurrent standardized on WordPress VIP. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- WordPress VIP's Pew Research Center case study says WordPress VIP remained the publishing system and delivery layer for Pew's research pages. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- Sanity's Morning Brew customer story says Morning Brew runs 13 brands, multiple studios and coordinated ad and editorial workflows, all powered by six engineers and a single Content Operating System, and that using Sanity's Content Operating System they built three tailored content apps for editorial, ad ops and partner teams. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- Statamic's showcase page lists DER SPIEGEL, credited 'Built by SPIEGEL_techlab', and TV2, credited 'Built by TV2', among sites built with Statamic. — source, checked 10 October 2026.
- Ghost's Explore page lists 404 Media, Platformer, The Lever and Hyperallergic among publications on Ghost. — source, checked 10 October 2026.